Re: Re: [PATCHES] patch for minor Win32 makefile bug
От | Fred Yankowski |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Re: [PATCHES] patch for minor Win32 makefile bug |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20010403144112.A54101@enteract.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Re: [PATCHES] patch for minor Win32 makefile bug (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Re: [PATCHES] patch for minor Win32 makefile bug
|
Список | pgsql-ports |
Tom, I experimented with different ways to do this patch and discussed this with Jason Tischler, and I now conclude that the meaning of DLLLIBS in the two makefiles is different enough that it doesn't make sense to try to factor-out common information to share between them. So I wish to withdraw my proposed patch entirely, leaving the two definitions of DLLLIBS as is. My apologies for the confusion. On Mon, Apr 02, 2001 at 01:48:23PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Jason Tishler <Jason.Tishler@dothill.com> writes: > > I now think that backend/Makefile is meant to override the definition > > of DLLLIBS in makefiles/Makefile.win so that the build of the backend > > will not try to link with itself (i.e., -L$(top_builddir)/src/backend > > -lpostgres). > > It seems like the real problem here is that DLLLIBS is being used for > two different purposes. How about offering a patch that splits it into > two symbols, with no redefinition/overriding necessary? -- Fred Yankowski fred@OntoSys.com tel: +1.630.879.1312 Principal Consultant www.OntoSys.com fax: +1.630.879.1370 OntoSys, Inc 38W242 Deerpath Rd, Batavia, IL 60510, USA
В списке pgsql-ports по дате отправления: