Re: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PORTS] pgmonitor and Solaris
От | Alfred Perlstein |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PORTS] pgmonitor and Solaris |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20010328161052.A9431@fw.wintelcom.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PORTS] pgmonitor and Solaris (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PORTS] pgmonitor and Solaris
|
Список | pgsql-admin |
* Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> [010328 16:07] wrote: > Larry Rosenman <ler@lerctr.org> writes: > > FYI, the WU-FTPD code (2.6.0 or better) has a couple of more platforms > > including UnixWare. The UnixWare code will need /dev/kmem permission to > > change it's stuff, so I don't know whether we want to do this or not, but > > if people are looking at the ps stuff, please look at this as well. > > Well, *I* sure wouldn't run Postgres with write permission on /dev/kmem. > Especially not just to make ps_status work... Wow... is this all for "pgmonitor"? sorry, just my opinion... If it for pgmonitor then you guys ought to just mark it broken on these platforms, the non-"ps based" solution could have been implemented with all the time wasted trying to get the "ps based" hack working. :( -- -Alfred Perlstein - [bright@wintelcom.net|alfred@freebsd.org] Daemon News Magazine in your snail-mail! http://magazine.daemonnews.org/
В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления: