Solaris problems (was Re: SPARC Solaris 8 OK)
От | Mathijs Brands |
---|---|
Тема | Solaris problems (was Re: SPARC Solaris 8 OK) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20010328023600.A98674@ilse.nl обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | SPARC Solaris 8 OK (Brian P Millett <bpm@ec-group.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Mar 27, 2001 at 10:34:13AM -0600, Brian P Millett allegedly wrote: > ====================== > All 76 tests passed. > ====================== > > vlad: uname -a > SunOS vlad 5.8 Generic_108528-06 sun4u sparc SUNW,Ultra-5_10 > > Reading specs from /opt/sfw/lib/gcc-lib/sparc-sun-solaris2.8/2.95.2/specs > gcc version 2.95.2 19991024 (release) > > CFLAGS=-O6 -mcpu=v8 -Wa,-xarch=v8plusa > CXXFLAGS=-O6 -felide-constructors -fno-exceptions -fno-rtti -mcpu=v8 -Wa,-xarch=v8plusa > > configure --prefix=/opt/pgsql \ > --with-tcl \ > --with-includes=/opt/sfw/include \ > --with-libraries=/opt/sfw/lib \ > --with-tclconfig=/opt/sfw/lib \ > --with-CC=gcc \ > --with-CXX=gcc > > This was cvs checjout this am (3/27/2001) > > Thanks. Erm, I've just tested 7.1RC1 on Solaris 8 x86 and SPARC. Solaris x86 works without any problems and passes the regression test (apart from a few very small roundoff errors in the geometry tests). However, on Solaris SPARC tests randomly fail (like someone else reported too). I've tried running configure without any options and the options given above, but the results were the same. I'm using gcc 2.95.3. I'll see if I can give the cvs version and gcc 2.95.2 a try tomorrow. Same goes for Solaris 7 SPARC and maybe Solaris 2.6 SPARC. Cheers, Mathijs -- It's not that perl programmers are idiots, it's that the language rewards idiotic behavior in a way that no other language or tool has ever done. Erik Naggum
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: