Re: /contrib 'cosmetic'

Added to TODO:
* Rename some /contrib modules from pg* to pg_*

> On Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 05:50:01PM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> 
> > 
> > >  In future ... please ignore patches those ignore the /contrib's practice
> > > -- the trouble is overhaul the contrib tree during each version.
> > 
> > The reason it's in contrib is that it's a bit less than perfect.  If we
> > were to prioritize on maintaining contrib, then we might as well fold it
> > into the core (which we ought to consider for some items).  IMHO.
> 
> Agree. You good remember previous state of the contrib -- something 
> wasn't compile-able, something was total dead ..etc. I want see nice code 
> in contrib and not say "the contrib is our trash and everybody can postpone
> something here" (it not means currect state is bad. It's better than 
> before 7.1, it's care about future :-). 
> 
>         Karel
> 
> -- 
>  Karel Zak  <zakkr@zf.jcu.cz>
>  http://home.zf.jcu.cz/~zakkr/
>  
>  C, PostgreSQL, PHP, WWW, http://docs.linux.cz, http://mape.jcu.cz
> 
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to majordomo@postgresql.org
> 


--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026