Re: Allowing WAL fsync to be done via O_SYNC
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Allowing WAL fsync to be done via O_SYNC |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200103160526.AAA13962@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Allowing WAL fsync to be done via O_SYNC (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Allowing WAL fsync to be done via O_SYNC
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes: > > My question was what are we needing to test? If we can do only single writes > > to the log, don't we prefer O_* to fsync, and the O_D* options over > > plain O_*? Am I confused? > > I don't think we have enough data to conclude that with any certainty. I just figured we knew the answers to above issues, that that the only issue was multiple writes vs. fsync(). It is hard for me to imagine O_* being slower than fsync(), or fdatasync being slower than fsync. Are we not able to assume that? -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania19026
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: