Re: WAL & SHM principles
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: WAL & SHM principles |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200103081645.LAA03243@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: WAL & SHM principles (Martin Devera <devik@cdi.cz>) |
Ответы |
Re: WAL & SHM principles
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> > > Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes: > > > > The only problem is that we would no longer have control over which > > > > pages made it to disk. The OS would perhaps write pages as we modified > > > > them. Not sure how important that is. > > > > > > Unfortunately, this alone is a *fatal* objection. See nearby > > > discussions about WAL behavior: we must be able to control the relative > > > timing of WAL write/flush and data page writes. > > > > Bummer. > > > BTW, what means "bummer" ? Sorry, it means, "Oh, I am disappointed." > But for many OSes you CAN control when to write data - you can mlock > individual pages. mlock() controls locking in physical memory. I don't see it controling write(). -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania19026
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: