Re: /usr/local/{include,lib} on Cygwin
От | Marko Kreen |
---|---|
Тема | Re: /usr/local/{include,lib} on Cygwin |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20010306235947.A11537@l-t.ee обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | /usr/local/{include,lib} on Cygwin (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
Список | pgsql-ports |
On Tue, Mar 06, 2001 at 05:35:16PM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Our build system is set up to automatically include -I/usr/local/include > and -L/usr/local/lib on the compile and link command lines on Cygwin. > Now I see a lot of users where this issues a warning message that this > directory doesn't exist. This may confuse new users. Also, shouldn't gcc > be searching these directories automatically? Can someone comment whether > it would be better to remove these explicit options? gcc uses them automatically: no why they are: cygipc should be there. [binary package installs there] When the user is new it does not have /usr/local, I guess he wont have cygipc too and the build fails anyway (?). Actually configure should search specifically for cygipc and report if not found. Last time I looked it blindly used '-L/usr/local/lib -lcygipc', so if the cygipc was missing it stopped mysterous places like checking whether the C compiler (gcc ) works... no I am ocassionally newbie too... And I had /usr/local. If I hadnt it maybe it would failed somewhere else, dunno, ATM I dont have NT nearby so cant test. -- marko
В списке pgsql-ports по дате отправления: