> Zeugswetter Andreas SB <ZeugswetterA@Wien.Spardat.at> writes:
> >> At least one of my concerns (single point of failure) would require a
> >> change to the layout of pg_control, which would force initdb anyway.
>
> > Was that the "only one checkpoint back in time in pg_control" issue ?
>
> Yes.
Is changing pg_control the thing that is going to require the initdb?
-- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610)
853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026