triggers vs. 'NEW in non-rule query' -- SOLVED?
От | will trillich |
---|---|
Тема | triggers vs. 'NEW in non-rule query' -- SOLVED? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20010304104945.B3610@mail.serensoft.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответы |
Re: triggers vs. 'NEW in non-rule query' -- SOLVED?
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On Sat, Mar 03, 2001 at 11:50:03PM -0500, Ron Peterson wrote: > > Could you provide an example of what *doesn't* work? > i THINK i've got it! MWAAH HA HA... i follow the example from the postgresql-doc/html/user/c4*40.html document and define a function to be called via TRIGGER... CREATE FUNCTION easy() RETURNS OPAQUE AS ' DECLARE x CHAR(1) := NEW.somefield FROM 1 FOR 1; BEGIN -- whatever, yada yada, bada bing bada boom RETURN NEW; END; ' language 'plpgsql'; and this results in "ERROR: use of NEW in non-rule procedure" when actually called via TRIGGER. i change it instead to CREATE FUNCTION easy() RETURNS OPAQUE AS ' DECLARE x CHAR(1); -- no := assignment here BEGIN x := NEW.somefield FROM 1 FOR 1; -- whatever, yada yada, bada bing bada boom RETURN NEW; END; ' language 'plpgsql'; and suddenly all is right with the world. so i can't refer to the NEW (or probably OLD) pseudotables WITHIN THE DECLARE section. apparently. Q: is this a bug? is this a feature? -- It is always hazardous to ask "Why?" in science, but it is often interesting to do so just the same. -- Isaac Asimov, 'The Genetic Code' will@serensoft.com http://groups.yahoo.com/group/newbieDoc -- we need your brain! http://www.dontUthink.com/ -- your brain needs us!
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: