Re: Re: Fixes to index pages

> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > The patch never intended to increase the index tuple length.  It was
> > only to better document how IndexTupleData is used.  Both Tom and I
> > agreed that the use of bits/contants/macros in itup.h was not idea, and
> > needed a little cleaning.  That's all the patch does.
>
> The original version of the patch commandeered an extra bit for tuple
> length.  If you back off INDEX_SIZE_MASK to 1FFF, and document bit
> 13 as unused/reserved, then it's just a cleanup.

OK, we are both catching up now on the email.  Should I put it in
current?  Seems like cosmetic cleanup.  Of course, even if you say yes,
I have to wait 24 hours.

--
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026