Re: WAL and commit_delay
От | Brent Verner |
---|---|
Тема | Re: WAL and commit_delay |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20010217183012.A24141@rcfile.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: WAL and commit_delay (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Re: WAL and commit_delay
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 17 Feb 2001 at 17:56 (-0500), Tom Lane wrote: [snipped] | Is anyone out there running a 2.4 Linux kernel? Would you try pgbench | with current sources, commit_delay=0, -B at least 1024, no -F, and see | how the results change when pg_fsync is made to call fdatasync instead | of fsync? (It's in src/backend/storage/file/fd.c) I've not run this requested test, but glibc-2.2 provides this bit of code for fdatasync, so it /appears/ to me that kernel version will not affect the test case. [glibc-2.2/sysdeps/generic/fdatasync.c] int fdatasync (int fildes) { return fsync (fildes); } hth. brent -- "We want to help, but we wouldn't want to deprive you of a valuable learning experience." http://openbsd.org/mail.html
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: