Re: transaction safety
От | DaVinci |
---|---|
Тема | Re: transaction safety |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20010214110556.A2081@fangorn.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: transaction safety (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: transaction safety
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On Tue, Feb 13, 2001 at 09:52:21AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > DaVinci <bombadil@wanadoo.es> writes: > > procedencia int2 references procedencia, > > l�nea int2 references l�nea, > > empresa int2 references empresa, > > Depending on the data values you are working with, it could be that the > foreign key references cause interlocks --- ie, one transaction has to > wait to see if the other commits to know if it has a valid foreign key. Problem is with referential integrity like you say. But I don't understand well reason. Interlocks should appear only when values of referenced tables are changed, added or removed, shouldn't they?. But that is not the case. I only insert in table "aviso". Is this normal? Greets. David
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: