bool type could be better documented
От | pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org |
---|---|
Тема | bool type could be better documented |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200102132120.f1DLKRi06365@hub.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответы |
Re: bool type could be better documented
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
Dave E Martin (xxiii@cyberdude.com) reports a bug with a severity of 4 The lower the number the more severe it is. Short Description bool type could be better documented Long Description The documentation in both 7.1 and 7.0.3 talks about the bool type but both fail to actually mention the name(s) of the typein the section on booleans. presumably its called 'boolean' based on the description, but it could be clearer. one has to refer to table 3-1 to makesure. (for instance, the description of 'money' makes it clear via the table, that the type is called 'money'). perhapsif the first sentence were changed from "Postgres supports the SQL99 boolean type" to "Postgres supports the SQL99 <BOLD>boolean</BOLD> type" (or quotes or something;whenever its being used as a name, and not to represent "concept of true/false state"). Its a bit like talkingabout a car which is named car... its obvious to the writer, but to the reader they just assume "concept of automobile"whenever they hear car, and never realize that its actually named "car". Sample Code http://www.postgresql.org/devel-corner/docs/user/datatype-boolean.htm No file was uploaded with this report
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: