Re: MySQL file system
От | Paul M Foster |
---|---|
Тема | Re: MySQL file system |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20010206004039.A16236@quillandmouse.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: MySQL file system (Mike Hoskins <mikehoskins@yahoo.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
On Tue, Jan 30, 2001 at 06:30:36PM -0600, Mike Hoskins wrote: <snip> > I, for one, want to see this succeed for MySQL, PostgreSQL, msql, etc. It's an > awesome feature that doesn't need to be speedy because it can save HUMANS time. > > The question really is, "When do we want to catch up to everyone else?" We are > always moving to higher levels of abstraction, anyway, so it's just a matter of > time. PG should participate. The rest of your argument is probably fine. I'm not qualified to argue the merits of this one way or another. But this passage's type of reasoning reminds me of the Linus/Tannenbaum microkernel debates. All the academics agreed that microkernel was _the_ way to go, and Linus disagreed for some very good reasons. So now we have Linux, and Minix has faded away. Yes, there are some working microkernels out there. But popularity or popular agreement does not make something a good idea. Can you say, "Windows"? Paul
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: