Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone
От | Ross J. Reedstrom |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20010129104352.B690@rice.edu обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 11:55:16PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > I said: > > > Yes, there are lots of systems that will clean /tmp --- and since the > > > lock file is an ordinary file (not a socket) pretty much any tmp-cleaner > > > is going to decide to remove it. I think that I had intended to insert > > > a periodic touch of the lockfile and forgot to. > > > > Done now. > > Yes, checkpoint is a good place to put it. Thanks. I still liked the > BRAINDAMAGED_TMP_CLEANER though. > Well, from reading the rest of the thread, it seems that, while tmpreaper _is_, in fact, brain damaged (it'll eat socket files) that wasn't what we were talking about: removal of apparently stale ordinary files, like our lockfile, is what tmp cleaners are all about, even if it is problematic. Personally, I've always thought tmp cleaners are a bad idea, a bandaid approach to cleaning up after poorly written software: i.e. broken by design. Well, it's resolved now, for pgsql. Can't fix all the software out there, I guess. Ross
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: