Re: Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone
От | Oliver Elphick |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200101290629.f0T6THF27855@linda.lfix.co.uk обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Re: Sure enough, the lock file is gone
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: >Just out of curiosity, does Debian enforce a nonstandard location for >X sockets as well? X has a big exception made for it in the FHS for /usr/X11R6; I don't see any mention of how /tmp/.X11/ is to be treated, but X isn't my problem! I suspect no-one has ever thought to ask the question! You may be pleased to know that I have now stirred the coals and asked that question, which applies not only to X but also to several other programs that I have running. It seems to me that the main reason for the problem is the need to cater for non-root installs. I would really like to know what proportion of total PostgreSQL installs they now are. We are a long way now from the days when Postgres was a research database with a poor reputation for reliability. It is now becoming a serious competitor to major commercial databases and will in many cases be used as a major application on the machines where it is installed. Are there still people who can only install PostgreSQL as a private application? -- Oliver Elphick Oliver.Elphick@lfix.co.uk Isle of Wight http://www.lfix.co.uk/oliver PGP: 1024R/32B8FAA1: 97 EA 1D 47 72 3F 28 47 6B 7E 39 CC 56 E4 C1 47 GPG: 1024D/3E1D0C1C: CA12 09E0 E8D5 8870 5839 932A 614D 4C34 3E1D 0C1C ======================================== "My son, if sinners entice thee, consent thou not." Proverbs 1:10
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: