Re: beta3 Solaris 7 (SPARC) port report
От | Frank Joerdens |
---|---|
Тема | Re: beta3 Solaris 7 (SPARC) port report |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20010126173951.C19363@rakete.joerdens.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: beta3 Solaris 7 (SPARC) port report (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jan 26, 2001 at 11:15:45AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Frank Joerdens <frank@joerdens.de> writes: > > Now I get: > > > select_distinct_on ... FAILED > > select_implicit ... FAILED > > random ... failed (ignored) > > portals ... FAILED > > test misc ... FAILED > > Reporting a regression failure this way is pretty unhelpful. Sorry. My thinking was that the bottom line here is the very non-reproducability of particular results. No two regression test failures where identical of the couple dozen or so I conducted, and hence it wouldn't make all that much sense to analyze any single test all by itself. As I wrote earlier, I don't have neither physical nor root access to this box. Moreover, the sysadmin tells me that he didn't install the OS himself, a friend of his did, because he himself was on holiday. There may well be something very fishy about the OSs configuration, but I wouldn't have the first notion as to where to start looking. It _appears_ that setting DEFAULT_PGSOCKET_DIR somewhere else besides /tmp has some positive effect, but that ain't conclusive. > What are > the actual diffs (regression.diffs)? What shows up in the postmaster > log (logs/postmaster.log)? Those results were overwritten by the last 10 tests that didn't show any errors, so I can't retrieve them, now. Regards, Frank
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: