Re: Performance: Unix sockets vs. TCP/IP sockets
| От | Frank Joerdens |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Performance: Unix sockets vs. TCP/IP sockets |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20010126170710.B19363@rakete.joerdens.de обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Performance: Unix sockets vs. TCP/IP sockets (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Список | pgsql-general |
On Thu, Jan 25, 2001 at 11:07:19PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Frank Joerdens <frank@joerdens.de> writes: > > What performance penalty can I expect when going over TCP/IP sockets > > instead of Unix sockets? > > On a properly designed kernel, there shouldn't be any measurable > performance difference between a local TCP connection and a Unix-socket > connection. Ah. That's good hear. I'd heard that TCP/IP was _significantly_ slower than Unix sockets. But maybe that was just Linux. > > There are not-so-well-designed kernels out there, but I forget which > they are (and you didn't bother to specify your platform anyway). It's Solaris 7 (cf. the current thread in hackers). > > If you want a reliable answer, fire up a data-transfer-intensive task, > say a COPY OUT of a large table, and time it both ways. I might try that in a couple of weeks' time when the current rush is over. Ta, Frank
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: