Re: [PATCHES] Re: [INTERFACES] Patch for JDBC timestamp problems

Thanks.  Applied.

> Right.
>
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >
> > OK, so you are saying I should apply the patch that removes the the
> > static.  I will do it now.  Thanks.  That clears up a few open emails
> > for me.
> >
> > > Joseph Shraibman wrote:
> > > >
> > > > No, it cannot be static.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Well actually there could be static variables, but they could not be
> > > used directly.  It might pay just to keep them around to clone() so we
> > > don't have to reconstruct them for every method that uses them.  But the
> > > performance gain would be minimal and would add a bit of confusion to
> > > the code, so I don't suggest it.
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Joseph Shraibman
> > > jks@selectacast.net
> > > Increase signal to noise ratio.  http://www.targabot.com
> > >
> >
> > --
> >   Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
> >   pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 853-3000
> >   +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
> >   +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
>
> --
> Joseph Shraibman
> jks@selectacast.net
> Increase signal to noise ratio.  http://www.targabot.com
>


--
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026