Re: Bit strings
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Bit strings |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200101192229.RAA15189@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Bit strings (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
OK, I will delete my copy of the email. If there is something to be added to the TODO list, let me know. [ People are welcome to modify it themselves too.] > Bruce Momjian writes: > > > Any idea where we are on this? > > > > Bit and hexstring literals are not handled in a reasonable fashion; > > Bit string literals are handled correctly, although it occurred to me that > perhaps > > #define IsA_Value(t) \ > (IsA(t, Integer) || IsA(t, Float) || IsA(t, String)) > > should be augmented with BitString. Can someone advise? > > Hex literals are still not handled correctly. > > > > SQL92 sez we need a position() function for bitstrings. > > We have one now. > > > > Need a regression test for bit types. > > We have one now. > > > > scalarltsel() and friends need to cope with bit/varbit types in > > > order to make good use of indexes on bitstrings. > > Not done. > > > > pg_dump does not handle BIT/VARBIT lengths properly (pjw may have > > > fixed this by now). > > Works fine for me. > > -- > Peter Eisentraut peter_e@gmx.net http://yi.org/peter-e/ > > -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania19026
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: