Re: Re: Getting configure to notice link-time vs run-time failures
От | Patrick Welche |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Re: Getting configure to notice link-time vs run-time failures |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20010119150959.F25920@quartz.newn.cam.ac.uk обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Getting configure to notice link-time vs run-time failures (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jan 19, 2001 at 12:46:53AM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Tom Lane writes: > > > Gene and I looked into this, and the cause of the misbehavior is this: > > gcc on this installation is set to search /usr/local/lib (along with the > > usual system library directories). libz.so and libreadline.so are > > indeed in /usr/local/lib, so configure's tests to see if they can be > > linked against will succeed. But he had LD_LIBRARY_PATH set to a list > > that did *not* include /usr/local/lib, so actually firing up the > > executable would fail. > > You get what you pay for. If you're running executables from configure > you're asking for it. > > This setup is a poor man's cross-compilation situation because the system > you're compiling on is not identically configured to the system you're > going to run on. (Strictly speaking, the behaviour of a test program > might even vary with different LD_LIBRARY_PATH settings.) > > So > > a) PostgreSQL does not support cross-compilation (yet). Too bad. > > b) We could get rid of all executition time checks in configure (to > remedy (a)). This is one of my plans for the future. > > c) You could move the execution time checks up before the suspicious > library checks, but I'm afraid that this will only cure a particular > symptom and might introduce other problems. > > I'd say, you're stuck. > > -- > Peter Eisentraut peter_e@gmx.net http://yi.org/peter-e/ > Wouldn't a -Wl,-R/usr/local/lib have helped? Cheers, Patrick
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: