Re: Re: Bug in date_part()
От | phil@Stimpy.netroedge.com |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Re: Bug in date_part() |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20010118101354.H30590@Stimpy.netroedge.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Re: Bug in date_part() (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-bugs |
Ah, I think I understand the trouble now. It's good it's fixed for the next release. And, as predicted, I'm running in a DST zone (/etc/localtime -> ../usr/share/zoneinfo/US/Pacific) Thanks for the quick diagnosis! Phil On Wed, Jan 17, 2001 at 09:07:34PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu> writes: > >> Query to reproduce the bug (7.0.3): > >> edge=# select date_part('dow','4/1/2001'::date)::int4; > >> ---------- > >> 6 > > > I'm not seeing this on my 7.0.2 RPM installation, or on my from-cvs > > current sources (dow for April 1 comes up as zero, as you would expect). > > I get the right answer from current sources, and the wrong one on 7.0.2. > It's ye olde date-to-timestamp-off-an-hour-at-DST-boundary problem. > Are you not running in a USA timezone? > > regards, tom lane -- Philip Edelbrock -- IS Manager -- Edge Design, Corvallis, OR phil@netroedge.com -- http://www.netroedge.com/~phil PGP F16: 01 D2 FD 01 B5 46 F4 F0 3A 8B 9D 7E 14 7F FB 7A
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: