Re: CRCs
От | ncm@zembu.com (Nathan Myers) |
---|---|
Тема | Re: CRCs |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20010113013647.A7991@store.zembu.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: CRCs (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jan 12, 2001 at 11:30:30PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > >> AFAICS, disk-block CRCs do not guard against mishaps involving intended > >> writes. They will help guard against data corruption that might creep > >> in due to outside factors, however. > > > Right. > > Given that we seem to have agreed on that, I withdraw my complaint about > disk-block-CRC not being in there for 7.1. I think we are still a ways > away from the point where externally-induced corruption is a major share > of our failure rate ;-). 7.2 or so will be time enough to add this > feature, and I'd really rather not force another initdb for 7.1. More to the point, putting CRCs on data blocks might have unintended consequences for dump or vacuum processes. 7.1 is a monumental accomplishment even without corruption detection, and the sooner the world has it, the better. Nathan Myers ncm@zembu.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: