Re: ALL, ANY bug?
От | Tatsuo Ishii |
---|---|
Тема | Re: ALL, ANY bug? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20010108160403W.t-ishii@sra.co.jp обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: ALL, ANY bug? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: ALL, ANY bug?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
You are right. However, SQL92 spec allows: select * from t1 where i <> all values(0,1); which is not allowed in PostgreSQL... -- Tatsuo Ishii > Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii@sra.co.jp> writes: > > It seems ALL and ANY (SOME) have problems with the parser. > > I see no problem here. Those are only defined for sub-selects. > SQL92 8.7 says: > > <quantified comparison predicate> ::= > <row value constructor> <comp op> <quantifier> <table subquery> > > <quantifier> ::= <all> | <some> > > <all> ::= ALL > > <some> ::= SOME | ANY > > and that is the only appearance of ANY in the grammar ... > > regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: