Re: GNU readline and BSD license
От | Alfred Perlstein |
---|---|
Тема | Re: GNU readline and BSD license |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20001229170908.F19572@fw.wintelcom.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: GNU readline and BSD license (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: GNU readline and BSD license
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
* The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org> [001229 17:06] wrote: > On Fri, 29 Dec 2000, Tom Lane wrote: > > > Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net> writes: > > > My understanding (from the recent discussion) is that Postgresql > > > has certain dependancies on libreadline and won't compile/work > > > without it, > > > > Then you're working from a misconception. > > I think the misconception that he might be working on here is the point > someone brought up that when configure runs, it is adding -lreadline to > the backend compile, even though that I don't think there is any reason > for doing such? I thought psql required libreadline, I'm not sure who said it. If nothing requires it then there's not much point in moving to libedit from a devel cost/benifit analysis. -- -Alfred Perlstein - [bright@wintelcom.net|alfred@freebsd.org] "I have the heart of a child; I keep it in a jar on my desk."
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: