Re: [HACKERS] Re: Tuple-valued datums on Alpha (was Re: 7.1 on DEC/Alpha)
От | Brent Verner |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Re: Tuple-valued datums on Alpha (was Re: 7.1 on DEC/Alpha) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20001227180555.A6402@rcfile.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Re: Tuple-valued datums on Alpha (was Re: 7.1 on DEC/Alpha) (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Re: Tuple-valued datums on Alpha (was Re: 7.1 on DEC/Alpha)
|
Список | pgsql-patches |
On 27 Dec 2000 at 16:50 (-0500), Tom Lane wrote: | After further study, I realized that fetchatt() and a number of other | places were not prepared to cope with 8-byte pass-by-value datatypes. | Most of them weren't checking for cases they couldn't handle, either. | | Here is a revised patch for you to try (this includes yesterday's patch | plus more changes, so you'll need to reverse out the prior patch before | applying this one). NOTE you will need to do a full reconfigure and | rebuild to make this fly --- I'd suggest "make distclean" to start. excellent! this patch fixes the SEGV problem in the regression tests. the only remaining failures, which are not due to SEGV, are: oid ... FAILED float8 ... FAILED geometry ... FAILED initial comments WRT failures: float8 fails only when building with gcc. oid recall seeing one-liner change to correct this. will try. many thanks, brent
В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления: