Re: Re: Tuple-valued datums on Alpha (was Re: 7.1 on DEC/Alpha)
От | Brent Verner |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Re: Tuple-valued datums on Alpha (was Re: 7.1 on DEC/Alpha) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20001227062916.A2354@rcfile.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Re: Tuple-valued datums on Alpha (was Re: 7.1 on DEC/Alpha) (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Re: Tuple-valued datums on Alpha (was Re: 7.1 on DEC/Alpha)
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 26 Dec 2000 at 23:41 (-0500), Tom Lane wrote: | Brent Verner <brent@rcfile.org> writes: | > | Please apply it locally and let me know what you find. | | > what I'm seeing now is much the same. | | Drat. More to do, then. after hours in the gdb-hole, I see this... maybe a clue? :) src/include/access/common/heaptuple.c: 450 { 451 452 /* 453 * Fix me when going to a machine with more than a four-byte 454 * word! 455 */ 456 off = att_align(off, att[j]->attlen, att[j]->attalign); 457 458 att[j]->attcacheoff = off; 459 460 off = att_addlength(off, att[j]->attlen, tp + off); 461 } I'm pretty sure I don't know best how to fix this, but I've got some randomly entered code compiling now :) If it passes the regression tests I'll send it along. brent 'glad the coffee shop in the backyard is open now :)'
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: