Re: Most efficient setup
От | Neil Conway |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Most efficient setup |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20001213082724.B2520@klamath.dyndns.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Most efficient setup (Aarmel <pgadmin@animated.net.au>) |
Список | pgsql-novice |
On Wed, Dec 13, 2000 at 06:26:08PM +1100, Aarmel wrote: > [...] > database1 -> table1, table2, table3 > > database2 -> table1, table2, table3 > > database3 -> table1, table2, table3. > > OR > > database -> database1table1, database1table2, database3table1 etc. > [...] > Also we need to be able to search all the tables acrosss all the databases. Since Postgres doesn't currently support queries over multiple databases, the best choice would probably be putting all the tables in a single database. And I'd be inclined to choose that design just for simplicities sake anyway. HTH, Neil -- Neil Conway <neilconway@home.com> Get my GnuPG key from: http://klamath.dyndns.org/mykey.asc Encrypted mail welcomed People of privilege will always risk their complete destruction rather than surrender any material part of their advantage. -- John Kenneth Galbraith
В списке pgsql-novice по дате отправления: