Re: Using Threads?
| От | Bruce Momjian |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Using Threads? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 200012090525.AAA14797@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Using Threads? (Tom Samplonius <tom@sdf.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Using Threads?
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
> > On Mon, 4 Dec 2000, Junfeng Zhang wrote: > > > All the major operating systems should have POSIX threads implemented. > > Actually this can be configurable--multithreads or one thread. > > I don't understand this. The OS can be configured for one thread? How > would that be any of use? > > > Thread-only server is unsafe, I agree. Maybe the following model can be a > > little better. Several servers, each is multi-threaded. Every server can > > support a maximum number of requests simultaneously. If anything bad > > happends, it is limited to that server. > > There is no difference. If anything bad happens with the current > multi-process server, all the postgres backends shutdown because the > shared memory may be corrupted. Yes. Are we adding reliability with per-process backends. I think so because things are less likely to go haywire, and we are more likely to be able to clean things up in a failure. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania19026
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: