Re: Re: Why PostgreSQL is not that popular as MySQL?
От | GH |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Re: Why PostgreSQL is not that popular as MySQL? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20001205182118.A80668@over-yonder.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Why PostgreSQL is not that popular as MySQL? (Tim Kientzle <kientzle@acm.org>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
On Mon, Dec 04, 2000 at 08:26:12PM -0800, some SMTP stream spewed forth: > Raymond Chui writes: > > I am wonder why most of people choose MySQL in Linux > > world rather than PostgreSQL? > > I've bounced between a couple of different DBMS over > the last year, and I have some pretty straightforward > ideas about the relative strengths of the ones I've > worked with: > > Oracle: > Plus: complete, fast, reliable > Minus: expensive and a PITA to install and administer > > MySQL: > Plus: lightweight, easy to administer, very fast > with simple queries/updates > Minus: slow with a mix of complex queries and updates, > incomplete SQL support. > > PostgreSQL: > Plus: more complete than MySQL, good performance > under a variety of situations > Minus: no BLOBs (soon to be rectified, I understand), *snip* > Of course, the MySQL developers aren't sitting still; > if they continue to improve MySQL to meet their > user's needs, then in a few years, MySQL could be > just as complete as PostgreSQL. > > - Tim ...assuming that PostgreSQL development halts for that time. ;-) gh
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: