Re: 8192 BLCKSZ ?
От | Nathan Myers |
---|---|
Тема | Re: 8192 BLCKSZ ? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20001128135018.E22345@store.zembu.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: 8192 BLCKSZ ? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Nov 28, 2000 at 04:24:34PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Nathan Myers <ncm@zembu.com> writes: > > In the event of a power outage, the drive will stop writing in > > mid-sector. > > Really? Any competent drive firmware designer would've made sure that > can't happen. The drive has to detect power loss well before it > actually loses control of its actuators, because it's got to move > the heads to the safe landing zone. If it checks for power loss and > starts that shutdown process between sector writes, never in the middle > of one, voila: atomic writes. I used to think that way too, because that's how I would design a drive. (Anyway that would still only give you 512-byte-atomic writes, which isn't enough.) Talking to people who build them was a rude awakening. They have apparatus to yank the head off the drive and lock it away when the power starts to go down, and it will happily operate in mid-write. (It's possible that some drives are made the way Tom describes, but evidently not the commodity stuff.) The level of software-development competence, and of reliability engineering, that I've seen among disk drive firmware maintainers distresses me whenever I think about it. A disk drive is best considered as throwaway cache image of your real medium. > Of course, there's still no guarantee if you get a hardware failure > or sector write failure (recovery from the write failure might well > take longer than the drive has got). But guarding against a plain > power-failure scenario is actually simpler than doing it the wrong > way. If only the disk-drive vendors (and buyers!) thought that way... Nathan Myers ncm@zembu.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: