Re: Re: [NOVICE] Re: re : PHP and persistent connections
| От | Ross J. Reedstrom |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Re: [NOVICE] Re: re : PHP and persistent connections |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20001127104608.B5246@rice.edu обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Re: [NOVICE] Re: re : PHP and persistent connections (Don Baccus <dhogaza@pacifier.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Re: [NOVICE] Re: re : PHP and persistent connections
Re: Re: [NOVICE] Re: re : PHP and persistent connections |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Uh, Don? Not all the world's a web page, you know. Thatkind of thinking is _so_ mid 90's ;-) Dedicated apps that talk directly the user seem to be making a comeback, due to a number of factors. They can have much cleaner user interfaces, for example. Which brings us back around to the point of why this is on Hackers: PostgreSQL currently has no clean method for dropping idle connections. Yes, some apps handle this themselves, but not all. A number of people seem to feel there is a need for this feature. How hard would it be to implement? Probably not too hard: we've already got an 'idle' state, suring which we block on the input. Add a timeout to hat, and we're pretty much there. <goes and looks at code for a bit> Hmm, we're down in the bowels of libpq, doing a recv() on the socket to the frontend, about 4 layers down from backend's blocking call to ReadCommand(). I seem to recall someone working on creating an async version of the libpq API, but Tom not being happy with the approach. So, it's not a simple change. Ross On Mon, Nov 27, 2000 at 07:18:48AM -0800, Don Baccus wrote: > At 12:38 AM 11/27/00 -0700, Ron Chmara wrote: > >Don Baccus wrote: > >> At 12:07 AM 11/26/00 -0500, Alain Toussaint wrote: > >> >how about having a middle man between apache (or aolserver or any other > >> >clients...) and PosgreSQL ?? > >> >that middleman could be configured to have 16 persistant connections,every > >> >clients would deal with the middleman instead of going direct to the > >> >database,this would be an advantage where multiple PostgreSQL server are > >> >used... > >> Well, this is sort of what AOLserver does for you without any need for > >> middlemen. > > > >What if you have a server farm of 8 AOL servers, and 12 perl clients, and > >3 MS Access connections, leaving things open? Is AOLserver parsing the > >Perl DBD/DBI, connects, too? So you're using AOLserver as (cough) a > >middleman? <g> Note that only the AOL servers here are web client/servers, the rest are dedicated apps. <snip Don missing the point> -- Open source code is like a natural resource, it's the result of providing food and sunshine to programmers, and then staying out of their way. [...] [It] is not going away because it has utility for both the developers and users independent of economic motivations. Jim Flynn, Sunnyvale, Calif.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: