Re: WAL fsync scheduling
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: WAL fsync scheduling |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200011181852.NAA28413@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: WAL fsync scheduling (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> Tom Lane writes: > > > OK, we can probably assume that at least one of sigsuspend or sigpause > > is available everywhere. > > #ifdef HAVE_POSIX_SIGNALS should tell you. > > > Now all you need is a free signal number. Unfortunately we're already > > using both SIGUSR1 and SIGUSR2. > > Maybe you could dump the old meaning SIGQUIT (externally invoked error), > move quickdie() to SIGQUIT, and you got SIGUSR1 free. > > (That would even make sense in two ways: 1) SIGQUIT would actually cause > the guy to quit; 2) there is a correspondence between postmaster and > postgres signals.) Good idea. Of course, this assumes my idea was valid. Was it? -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania19026
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: