Re: [HACKERS] Re: PHPBuilder article -- Postgres vs MySQL
От | Marko Kreen |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Re: PHPBuilder article -- Postgres vs MySQL |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20001117035411.A10861@l-t.ee обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Re: PHPBuilder article -- Postgres vs MySQL (The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Re: PHPBuilder article -- Postgres vs MySQL
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On Thu, Nov 16, 2000 at 01:33:08PM -0400, The Hermit Hacker wrote: > On Wed, 15 Nov 2000, Charles Tassell wrote: > > > Just a note, I've been using Postgres 7.02 and PHP 4.02 or 4.03 for about a > > month in a couple sites, and haven't experienced any problems with > > persistent connections. Problem might have been fixed in one of the point > > releases, or maybe I just don't have enough different db connections to > > trigger it. > > I run PHP4 and IMP (http://www.horde.org) and we've gotten then to remove > the useof pg_pconnect() since it is broken. Broken how, you might > ask? Well, I ran on a standalone machine, no other web users but myself, > to test, and each tim eI hit the database with IMP,. it opened a new > backend, but it never reused old, idle ones ... eventually, you run out of > the ability to connect since you've locked up all connections ... Maybe you have the apache maxspareservers set too high? I run PHP4/apache (debian-woody) and it works ok. If this is only IMP site maybe you are better off apache.MaxClients = postgres.backendcount Just a thought. -- marko
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: