Re: RE: [COMMITTERS] pgsql/src/backend/access/transam ( xact.c xlog.c)
От | Alfred Perlstein |
---|---|
Тема | Re: RE: [COMMITTERS] pgsql/src/backend/access/transam ( xact.c xlog.c) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20001116121258.L830@fw.wintelcom.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: RE: [COMMITTERS] pgsql/src/backend/access/transam ( xact.c xlog.c) (Larry Rosenman <ler@lerctr.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: RE: [COMMITTERS] pgsql/src/backend/access/transam (
xact.c xlog.c)
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
* Larry Rosenman <ler@lerctr.org> [001116 12:09] wrote: > * Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> [001116 14:02]: > > > > This sounds like an interesting approach, yes. > > > Question: Is sleep(0) guaranteed to at least give up control? > > > > > > The way I read my UnixWare 7's man page, it might not, since alarm(0) > > > just cancels the alarm... > > > > Well, it certainly is a kernel call, and most OS's re-evaluate on kernel > > call return. > BUT, do we know for sure that sleep(0) is not optimized in the library > to just return? sleep(3) should conform to POSIX specification, if anyone has the reference they can check it to see what the effect of sleep(0) should be. -- -Alfred Perlstein - [bright@wintelcom.net|alfred@freebsd.org] "I have the heart of a child; I keep it in a jar on my desk."
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: