Re: Coping with 'C' vs 'newC' function language namesh

On Thu, Nov 16, 2000 at 05:51:07PM +0200, 'Marko Kreen' wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 16, 2000 at 09:32:43AM -0600, Ross J. Reedstrom wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 16, 2000 at 04:16:26PM +1100, Philip Warner wrote:
> > >     Create Module foo_mod from library 'path-to-lib';
> > 
> > Phil - be careful with the nomenclature. We've got another naming collision,
> > here. SQL9[29] talk about modules, which may or may not be related to what
> > your suggesting here.
> 
> Do you know any url's where the SQL* standards could be looked
> up?
> 
> Mark Hollomon's idea was to use 'package' not 'module', but
> ofcourse it would be nice to be SQL* conforming.

Well, the 1999 standards seem to live at:

ftp://jerry.ece.umassd.edu/isowg3/x3h2/Standards/

Which is the working repository for the ANSI database committee (x3h2)

Ross
-- 
Open source code is like a natural resource, it's the result of providing
food and sunshine to programmers, and then staying out of their way.
[...] [It] is not going away because it has utility for both the developers 
and users independent of economic motivations.  Jim Flynn, Sunnyvale, Calif.