Re: Coping with 'C' vs 'newC' function language namesh
От | Ross J. Reedstrom |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Coping with 'C' vs 'newC' function language namesh |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20001116093243.A7129@rice.edu обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Coping with 'C' vs 'newC' function language namesh (Philip Warner <pjw@rhyme.com.au>) |
Ответы |
Re: Coping with 'C' vs 'newC' function language namesh
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Nov 16, 2000 at 04:16:26PM +1100, Philip Warner wrote: > > and possibly, > > Create Module foo_mod from library 'path-to-lib'; > > The idea being to only store whe function signature and enough details to > get to the info-function. If 'Create Module' were allowed, then it would > automatically create appropriate function definitions when the statement > was executed. > Phil - be careful with the nomenclature. We've got another naming collision, here. SQL9[29] talk about modules, which may or may not be related to what your suggesting here. Ross -- Open source code is like a natural resource, it's the result of providing food and sunshine to programmers, and then staying out of their way. [...] [It] is not going away because it has utility for both the developers and users independent of economic motivations. Jim Flynn, Sunnyvale, Calif.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: