Re: Re: New relkind for views
От | Mark Hollomon |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Re: New relkind for views |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20001016205301.A975@jupiter обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Re: New relkind for views (The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: Re: New relkind for views
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Oct 16, 2000 at 08:41:43PM -0300, The Hermit Hacker wrote: > On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > > "Hollomon, Mark" wrote: > > > > > > > > Do we still want to be able to inherit from views? > > > > > > Also: > > > > > > Currently a view may be dropped with either 'DROP VIEW' > > > or 'DROP TABLE'. Should this be changed? > > > > I say let them drop it with either one. > > I kinda like the 'drop index with drop index', 'drop table with drop > table' and 'drop view with drop view' groupings ... at least you are > pretty sure you haven't 'oopsed' in the process :) > > So the vote is now tied. Any other opinions -- Mark Hollomon mhh@mindspring.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: