Re: Isn't non-TEST_AND_SET code long dead?

> Mike Mascari <mascarm@mascari.com> writes:
> > On a somewhat related note, what about the NO_SECURITY defines
> > strewn throughout the backend? Does anyone run the server with
> > NO_SECURITY defined? And if so, what benefit is that over just
> > running with everything owned by the same user?
> 
> I suppose the idea was to avoid expending *any* cycles on security
> checks if you didn't need them in your particular situation.  But
> offhand I've never heard of anyone actually using the feature.  I'm
> dubious whether the amount of time saved would be worth the trouble.

NO_SECURITY define removed.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026