Re: possible constraint bug?
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: possible constraint bug? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200010121924.PAA13798@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: possible constraint bug? (Stephan Szabo <sszabo@megazone23.bigpanda.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: possible constraint bug?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Is this addressed in 7.1? > > This is particular to postgres, although the > SQL behavior would have either dropped > the constraint or prevented the drop in the > first place. > > There's been some talk of an ALTER FUNCTION > that would let you change the code behind > a function without a drop/create. > > Generally you have to re-generate things that > reference functions that have been dropped > and re-created. This is a pain right now > for constraints, since it requires a dump > and restore of the table. > > On Fri, 18 Aug 2000, Thomas Swan wrote: > > > > > Using Postgresql 7.0.2 (Linux x86, 2.2.16) > > > > CERATE FUNCTION foo(text) > > > > CREATE TABLE bar( > > fud TEXT CHECK (foo(fud)) > > ); > > > > DROP FUNCTION foo(TEXT); > > CREATE FUNCTION foo( .....); > > > > INSERT INTO bar VALUES ('Hey'); results in the following error > > > > ERROR init_fcache: Cache lookup failed for procedure 128384 > > > > Is this particular to postgres or is this a normal SQLxx standard behavior? > > -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania19026
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: