foreign key introduces unnecessary locking ?
От | Rini Dutta |
---|---|
Тема | foreign key introduces unnecessary locking ? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20001002153951.12654.qmail@web2904.mail.yahoo.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] foreign key introduces unnecessary locking ?
|
Список | pgsql-sql |
Hi, When two tables (table2 and table3) have foreign keys referring to a common table(table1), I am unable to have 2 concurrent transactions - one performing insert on table1 and the other on table2, when the records being inserted have the same foreign key. If I use JDBC, one of the transactions aborts. If I open 2 psql sessions and try the same, one just waits and does not show the prompt until the other transaction has been committed or aborted. For example, create table tmp1(idx int4, data int4); create table tmp2(idx2 int4, col2 int4, constraint tmpcon2 foreign key(col2) references tmp1(idx)); create table tmp3(idx3 int4, col3 int4, constraint tmpcon3 foreign key(col3) references tmp1(idx)); insert into tmp1 values(1, 1); Transaction 1 : begin work; insert into tmp2 values(2, 1); Transaction2 : begin work; insert into tmp3 values(3,1); Since such transactions are common for me, for the time-being I have dropped the foreign key constraint. Any ideas ? Rini __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Photos - 35mm Quality Prints, Now Get 15 Free! http://photos.yahoo.com/
В списке pgsql-sql по дате отправления: