Re: Performance for seq. scans
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Performance for seq. scans |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200007271935.PAA29124@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Performance for seq. scans (Jules Bean <jules@jellybean.co.uk>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
> > We were in a similar position and went for the 'Full Text Indexing" extra. > > You'll find it in contrib/fulltextindex. > > It creates a function which you call on a trigger to produce an index of > > words for specified fields. These indexes do get _very_ large (one of ours > > is ~800 MB), but it does work very well and speeds searches up enormously. > > If I understand you correctly, that's word-based? It's just splitting > on whitespace and punctuation? Unfortunately, that's not quite what > we need --- our wildcard searches needn't have their '%' on word > boundaries. It is not word-based. It slices each word into pieces and indexes it. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000 + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: