Re: Index selection on a large table
От | bruc@stone.congenomics.com (Robert E. Bruccoleri) |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Index selection on a large table |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200007270021.UAA10748@stone.congenomics.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Index selection on a large table ("Michael Richards" <michael@fastmail.ca>) |
Список | pgsql-bugs |
I have seen the same problem with poor default query plans. Unfortunately, VACUUM ANALYZE is not an acceptable option because it takes far too long to reindex a massive table. The behavior under PostgresQL 6.5.3, which apparently assumed that all indexed entries were nearly unique works well for my applications, whereas the current behavior under 7.0 does NOT work when it most matters, for really big tables. I do recommend to the developers that they reconsider the current choice because it appears to be bug, not a feature. +----------------------------------+------------------------------------+ | Robert E. Bruccoleri, Ph.D. | Phone: 609 737 6383 | | President, Congenomics, Inc. | Fax: 609 737 7528 | | 114 W Franklin Ave, Suite K1,4,5 | email: bruc@acm.org | | P.O. Box 314 | URL: http://www.congen.com/~bruc | | Pennington, NJ 08534 | | +----------------------------------+------------------------------------+
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: