Re: Re: [GENERAL] Is Pg 7.0.x's Locking Mechanism BROKEN?

frank wrote:
> Thanks Fabrice, that will help a lot.
>
> In my applications the conflict was not a direct table conflict e.g.
> USER1 locks Table1 record that references Table2 via foreign key with a
> cascade update/delete enforced then
> USER2 tried to lock Table2 for update on the referenced record - result both
> users locked !
>
> Is this the same scenario in your case ?
> perhaps a simple test db could used to resolve if this is the issue !
   Looks  like  a  deadlock  situation  not seen by the deadlock   detection code.  Unfortunately I'm not able  to
reproduce a   lockup  with  a  simple  test  DB.   Could  you post a simple   (trans1 does  ...,  trans2  does  ...)
sample so  we  coule   reproduce such a lockup?
 


Jan

--

#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me.                                  #
#================================================== JanWieck@Yahoo.com #