Re: dramatic slowdown. . .fixed by vacuum
От | Joe Slag |
---|---|
Тема | Re: dramatic slowdown. . .fixed by vacuum |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20000721144219.A23144@isis.visi.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | RE: dramatic slowdown in selects after pg has been runni ng for a while (patrick.wolf@Aerojet.com (WOLF, PATRICK)) |
Ответы |
Re: Re: dramatic slowdown. . .fixed by vacuum
Re: Re: dramatic slowdown. . .fixed by vacuum |
Список | pgsql-novice |
On Fri, Jul 21, 2000 at 12:36:35PM -0700, WOLF, PATRICK wrote: > Try running vacuum on the table or the database. Here's an excerpt from the > man on vacuum: > [snip] > > Thanks to all who responded. I vacuumed out foo, and sure enough the select time is down to 10 seconds again. I see in the docs the suggestion: We recommend that active production databases be VACUUMM-ed nightly Is this how people tend to do their vacuuming? Does anyone do programmatic vacuums instead of / in addition to a nightly run? Is vacuuming mainly necessary after big deletes, or are there other common situations requiring it? Joe Slag Wagpaw, Inc.
В списке pgsql-novice по дате отправления: