Untrusted PL/Tcl?

Hi all,
   there  have  been a couple of questions WRT doing untrustable   things like file access, LDAP and the  like  from
inside of   triggers or functions.
 
   Tcl  is  a  powerful  language and could do all that, but the   interpreter used in PL/Tcl is a safe one,  because
it is  a   trusted  procedural  language  (any  non-superuser can create   functions). I think it should  be  pretty
easy to  build  a   second   PL  handler  into  the  module,  that  executes  the   procedures in a full featured Tcl
interpreter,that  has  all   capabilities. This one would be installed as an untrusted PL,   so  only  DB  superusers
could create  functions  in   that   language.
 
   Should  I  go  for  it and if so, how should this language be   named?


Jan

--

#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me.                                  #
#================================================== JanWieck@Yahoo.com #