PgAccess diagrams (was: Re: Just committed some changes...)
От | Ross J. Reedstrom |
---|---|
Тема | PgAccess diagrams (was: Re: Just committed some changes...) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20000714144302.B23317@rice.edu обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Just committed some changes... (Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jul 14, 2000 at 04:14:28PM +0000, Thomas Lockhart wrote: > Define SCHEMA keyword, along with stubbed-out grammar. I was just digging into pgaccess a little, cleaning up the diagramming feature I had added. In a fit of naivete, I had called them "schema", as in the logical idea, not the SQL key word. Since we're going to be implementing SQL SCHEMA, eventually, perhaps this would be a good time to rename this feature in pgaccess. How does "Diagrams" sound? Anyone have a better idea? The name appears on a tab. The other tabs are labelled: Tables, Queries, Views, Sequences, Functions, Reports, Forms, Scripts, Users, ????. Keep in mind, I have been thinking about connecting the schema diagrammer into the visual query builder, so that you can set a 'strict' mode, where it'll only allow joins that have been defined in the schema editor. That's why I named it schema, in the first place. It'd be nice to have the diagramming interact with primary key/foreign key constraints, optionally drawing them in automatically. However, all it does right now is draw tables and let you draw links between them, by dragging and dropping fieldnames. Ross -- Ross J. Reedstrom, Ph.D., <reedstrm@rice.edu> NSBRI Research Scientist/Programmer Computer and Information Technology Institute Rice University, 6100 S. Main St., Houston, TX 77005
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: