Re: Slashdot discussion
От | eschmid+sic@s.netic.de |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Slashdot discussion |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20000711015549.60820@s.netic.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Slashdot discussion (The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: Slashdot discussion
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On Mon, Jul 10, 2000 at 08:40:27PM -0300, The Hermit Hacker wrote: > On Tue, 11 Jul 2000, Graeme Merrall wrote: > > > > > > Is anyone else noticing this: Everytime this sort of thing comes up a > > > number of people invariably tell that they are using MySQL because it's > > > easier to install, and that PostgreSQL is difficult ("a pain") to install. > > > > > > I've studied the MySQL installation instructions, and they don't strike me > > > as inherently simpler. Is it only perception, or what can we do better? > > Possibly because for most people the process is a simple './configure; > > make; make install' > > > > Pgsql doesn't do this. Not the install process is any less better but > > huh? all i do is './configure;make;make install' ... And what about CVS? bash-2.01$ cd ../pgsql bash-2.01$ cvs -z9 update -dP cvs [update aborted]: authorization failed: server postgresql.org rejected access bash-2.01$ -Egon
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: