Re: upper() problem in 7.0.2
От | Christopher L. Cousins |
---|---|
Тема | Re: upper() problem in 7.0.2 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20000706150340.A9354@cobalt.impulse.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: upper() problem in 7.0.2 (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-bugs |
On Thu, Jul 06, 2000 at 05:03:21PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > "Christopher L. Cousins" <chris-pgsql-bugs@cobalt.impulse.net> writes: > > #2 0xdaa41 in fixedlen_like ( > > s=0x1eeff4 "MQZSVRSJDSFR"... <Address 0x1ef000 out of bounds>, p=0x1bdbe0, > > charlen=12) at like.c:53 > > #3 0xdab1d in textlike (s=0x1eeff0, p=0x1bdbe0) at like.c:100 > > Oooh, I see it ... nasty! fixedlen_like is effectively assuming that > it can access one byte beyond the end of the data string. You've > managed to set up a situation where one byte beyond falls off the > end of the world (or the end of the backend's allocated memory, anyway). > > I was having no luck reproducing it here, probably because of different > malloc behavior on my OS. Thanks for going the extra mile to get that > backtrace. No problem, I'm just glad I was able to reproduce it on a box I could get a clean backtrace from. > This bug has probably been there all along, but it'd be pretty > low-probability under most circumstances. FYI, either postgres 6.3.2 did not have this problem or what I am doing did not trigger it in 6.3.2 (I recently upgraded from 6.3.2 to 7.0.2). > Will create a patch shortly. Need to look to see what other places > may be using the same bogus coding pattern... Ok, thanks! -- --Chris ____ Impulse Internet Services / \ ____________________________/ \_____ http://www.impulse.net <chris@impulse.net>
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: