Re: Two many databases...
От | Timothy Grant |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Two many databases... |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20000706105919.A876@reepicheep.avalongroup.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Two many databases... (Robert <robert@robert.cz>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
On Thu, Jul 06, 2000 at 12:21:31PM +0200, Robert wrote: > - each client gets separate database > > - one common database for all clients, each table has client_id field > added I'm not in your situation, but I can tell you that if you went with method two, I would not recommend your services to my clients. I work with many many law firms, and the possibility of their data getting mixed up with someone elses (no matter how remote) would prevent me from recommending that path. While the maintenance is a bigger problem, I don't see it at nightmare level. The biggest problem appears to occur when making table/index level changes. I would think that it should be possible to write a wrapper for those kind of updates that would make them across the board to each client. -- Stand Fast, tjg. Timothy Grant tjg@exceptionalminds.com Chief Technology Officer www.exceptionalminds.com Red Hat Certified Engineer (503) 246-3630 Avalon Technology Group, Inc. fax (503) 246-3124 >>>>>>>>>>>>Linux...Because crashing isn't normal<<<<<<<<<<<<<
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: